[b]Why should Saddam Hussein be charged with War Crimes that our own President Dubya has been [i]guilty [/i]of committing himself??? [/b]Refer to "[i]'War crimes: Bush should follow Saddam into the dock'[/i]" on http://www.smirkingchimp.com/... ... Moreover, shouldn't Poppy Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld be tried along-side of Saddam Hussein, for they [i]gave him the weaponry and gave him the go-ahead [/i]to commit the very crimes for which he is being charged (these very same attacks upon his own people) without which he could not have succeeded in perpetrating?!?
"We the People" should be outraged at the insane neo-orwellian rationalizations that have led the corrupt Bush regime to illegally and immorally invade a sovereign nation (Iraq); depose the elected leader based upon a series of heinous lies, deceptions and falsehoods; and, then demand that Saddam Hussein be put on trial for actions encouraged and supported by Poppy Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld [i]at the time [/i]that they were carried out ... And, then these same War Crimes (i.e. Dubya/Cheney have massacred over 16,000 Innocent Iraqi Civilians) [i]have been & are being [/i]committed by the traitorous Bush/Cheney Inc. [i]junta[/i]!!! ... Meanwhile the neo-fascists Bush and Cheney continue to perpetrate criminal lies, deceptions and falsehoods regarding their bloody neo-con fiasco in Iraq!!! ... Who is telling the truth??? ...[i] Hmmm [/i]...
Apparently Saddam Hussein, during long months in captivity, kept telling the truth—exactly the truth that Bush administration interrogators didn’t want to hear. In reporting that borders on the idiotic, Neil Lewis and David Johnston today in [i]The New York Times[/i] http://www.nytimes.com/2004/0... quote unnamed U.S. officials who questioned Saddam, who say, “We got very little, I would say almost nothing.” And then this stunner:
... [i]"The official said Mr. Hussein had willingly discussed the roots of the Ba'ath Party in the 1970s but became uncooperative when the questions turned to illegal weapons or links to Al Qaeda. “I never saw anything useful,” the official said[/i]." ...
Let’s leave aside the fact that the “roots” of the Ba'ath go back to the 1940s, and that by the 1970s Saddam was firmly in power and the Baath (different branches from those same “roots”) was running both Iraq and Syria. Earth to Lewis and Johnston: WMD? Al Qaeda? So now we know that Saddam continued to tell the truth after his capture—the same truth he and his government told again and again before the war: that Iraq didn’t have any WMD and that Iraq didn’t have any connections to Al Qaeda. Incredibly, the[i] Times [/i]doesn’t even nod in that direction, leaving the “U.S. official” as the last word on the topic.
The second Saddam truth, from his appearance in the Chalabi-run kangaroo court, was this. Said Saddam: “You know, this is all a theater by Bush, to help him win the election.”[i] Anyone disagree[/i]???
Bush has indeed done precisely what Hussein is charged with doing: killing innocent Iraqis in an insane power-grab and to control oil... Both should be tried and forced to live together in a tiny cell for the rest of their despicable lives!
posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 07.06.04 (8:02 am)
Good blog. Saddam Hussein was Bush 41's good buddy until the Gulf War. The Bush family are in the pockets of the Saudi Royal family: it used to be called treason! Bush should get whatever sentence is handed down to Saddam!
posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 07.06.04 (11:25 am)
bush is using saddam hussein to cover-up his own war crimes in iraq. you are right on!
